In the lies, damn lies and statistics department the FCC has made another contribution. The Commisison's most current compilation of broadband market share shows wireless (satellite and cellular) acquiring over 24% from wireline cable television and telco options. See http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-277784A1.pdf and compare with the prior calculation: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270128A1.pdf.
How could this be? Well in reality I doubt whether many consumers would gladly pay more than double for a fraction of the bit rate available from wired options. But (and here's the snarky part) if one calculated broadband using an unrealistically low bar--say 200 kilobits per second--and if one ignores cost, then suddenly wireless options have become a major--here's the pay off--FACILITIES-BASED COMPETITOR of the cable/telco duopoly.
If only I could think and grow rich just as the FCC thinks competition exists and its statistics make it so.
In reality wireless options have their niche role wven though they offer no more than 500 or so kilobits per second. If you are on the road and have no wi-fi or wired option, then 500 kbps is better than nothing. But the FCC wants the statistics to evidence that robust competition exists in the real broadband arena (1 megabit or faster). The cable/telco duopoly is alive and well.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Great blog with lots of useful information and excellent commentary! Thanks for sharing. DSL internet service providers
Ive read this topic for some blogs. But I think this is more informative.
Can anyone recommend the top Network Management software for a small IT service company like mine? Does anyone use Kaseya.com or GFI.com? How do they compare to these guys I found recently: N-able N-central system network
? What is your best take in cost vs performance among those three? I need a good advice please... Thanks in advance!
Post a Comment