Some stakeholders
support a growing strategy by incumbent carriers to offload ever increasing
bandwidth demand onto other networks including unlicensed Wi-Fi. See https://www.qualcomm.com/.../making-the-best-use-of-unlicensed-spectrum
Not so long
ago, carriers prematurely handing off traffic to another carrier risked being
branded as a “hot potato” router. See a
2013 blog entry on the subject: http://telefrieden.blogspot.com/2012/03/hot-potato-routing-and-real-or-imagined.html.
The consolidated Bell System took
pride in offering “one system with end to end responsibility.” Now it does not
seem to matter if another carrier handles traffic if the strategies accrue cost
savings.
It should
come as no surprise that incumbent licensed carriers would prefer consumers not
have an unlicensed alternative, particularly in light of the billions paid for
spectrum. Whether provided free, below cost, or on profit generating terms, municipal
Wi-Fi is reviled as socialism. Many
legislators have bought this logic, even though they don’t seem to fret over
taxpayer subsidized stadiums, golf courses, cemeteries, libraries, sewers and water
authorities. With righteous indignation,
opponents of municipal Wi-Fi networks claim the socialists ignore the rule of
law. Never mind the law was championed, (make
that written) by stakeholders keen on removing, or reducing any unmetered
option. They would love a prohibition on
home Wi-Fi routers, but somewhere a line can be drawn where federal authority
preempts “states’ rights” and offers consumers a much welcomed option to increase the value of a broadband subscription.
Others consider this a clever tactic to reduce spectrum
auction payments while contributing to congestion in frequency band designed to
provide consumers with an unlicensed, unmetered and cheaper alternative to licensed
carrier service. http://www.infoworld.com/article/2942455/networking/lte-u-is-coming-to-take-your-wi-fi-away-consumer-advocates-warn.html#tk.drr_mlt.
Incumbent
carriers must maneuver a difficult course where they tolerate (if not welcome)
some free spectrum, if they can use it for commercial purposes, coupled with a
global bar on the socialistic version called municipal Wi-Fi.
1 comment:
Good, specific article on Telecommunications. I would highly recommend
Post a Comment